Nel suo post su Substack, il ministro degli Esteri britannico David Lammy sembra approvare le azioni dell’Azerbaigian nel Nagorno-Karabakh, definendole una liberazione.
Nel suo post su Substack, il ministro degli Esteri britannico David Lammy sembra approvare le azioni dell’Azerbaigian nel Nagorno-Karabakh, definendole una liberazione.
>As I left Ukraine, I could not help but reflect on how Putin’s imperialist actions are having the opposite effect.
>In Kyiv, people take pride in their Ukrainian identity. The desire to remain close to the rest of Europe was clear for all to see. And with the opening of EU accession negotiations, this relationship is growing ever stronger.
>The same effect is notable across Russia’s neighbours. The states of Central Asia look increasingly east and south. **Azerbaijan has been able to liberate territory it lost in the early 1990s.** Georgia and Moldova are engaging with NATO and EU.
>Only a few fragile regimes like Belarus, DPRK and Iran still align with Moscow. Even in the twenty-first century, Tsardom has its limits.
Afaik this is the first instance of a major Western official labelling what Azerbaijan did as liberation and he joins the esteemed ranks of various Turkish and Central Asian officials (maybe also Russian/Belarussian and some other 3rd world countries).
Britis want their oil that it. They ain’t in the eu and that’s a good thing. They can say what they want the majority of that fish n chips nation don’t even know or care what he’s talking about.Â
We already know of the the things that go on between both nations closed doors and it involves a bunch of thick black lube (oil:)
RebootedShadowRaider on
I think Britain puts in even less effort to pretend to care about human rights compared to the rest of the West. They’ve always favored Azerbaijan.
3 Comments
Relevant passage:
>As I left Ukraine, I could not help but reflect on how Putin’s imperialist actions are having the opposite effect.
>In Kyiv, people take pride in their Ukrainian identity. The desire to remain close to the rest of Europe was clear for all to see. And with the opening of EU accession negotiations, this relationship is growing ever stronger.
>The same effect is notable across Russia’s neighbours. The states of Central Asia look increasingly east and south. **Azerbaijan has been able to liberate territory it lost in the early 1990s.** Georgia and Moldova are engaging with NATO and EU.
>Only a few fragile regimes like Belarus, DPRK and Iran still align with Moscow. Even in the twenty-first century, Tsardom has its limits.
https://davidlammy.substack.com/p/the-united-kingdom-and-the-united
Afaik this is the first instance of a major Western official labelling what Azerbaijan did as liberation and he joins the esteemed ranks of various Turkish and Central Asian officials (maybe also Russian/Belarussian and some other 3rd world countries).
Also just saw the news was also shared elsewhere https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/s/Xim3dIOcRN
Britis want their oil that it. They ain’t in the eu and that’s a good thing. They can say what they want the majority of that fish n chips nation don’t even know or care what he’s talking about.Â
We already know of the the things that go on between both nations closed doors and it involves a bunch of thick black lube (oil:)
I think Britain puts in even less effort to pretend to care about human rights compared to the rest of the West. They’ve always favored Azerbaijan.