Il Galles valuta un taglio del 25% delle tasse sul reddito per affrontare la crisi della “fuga dei cervelli”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/income/wales-mulls-25pc-income-tax-cut-tackle-depopulation-crisis/

di Low_Map4314

9 Comments

  1. TwentyCharactersShor on

    Uhm, nice, but Wales needs to have worthwhile jobs. North Wales definitely needs a city.

  2. CharringtonCross on

    Great, we could do with a bit of fiscal competition within the Union.

  3. So will this proposal result in an equivalent cut in the Welsh Government budget? If so it seems counter intuitive as it will reduce funding for public services.

    Or will it just result in a cut to the money going to HMRC while the Welsh Government budget remains the same?

    Either way its going to be a tough sell considering there is a big hole in the public finances at the moment.

  4. bluecheese2040 on

    Sums up this country. We have record population levels…record immigration levels…yet we still battle depopulation.

    It’s almost like the country is far too focussed on…London and one or two other places

  5. Sunbreak_ on

    Sound interesting until you realise it’s less brain drain and more welsh language nationalism. If they did something like this, from what the article says, it’d be for welsh speakers only. Because they’re the only people who matter to Plaid and much of our welsh leadership. Que us all lying to say how much welsh we speak.

  6. Perudur1984 on

    Needs to be a 100% cut. I already pay income tax to the UK government.

  7. Sudden-Conclusion931 on

    Chris Etherington, of tax firm RSM, doubted whether tax breaks are the way to go. He said: “It’s clear that tax can be a significant motivator for people to move away from a country, so in theory the opposite could be true, but there is limited evidence to demonstrate this is effective.

    “Care would also need to be taken to ensure that any such policies are not subject to abuse and target the right people.”

    I’m all for evidenced-based policy making but this is the sort of nonsense that gives it a bad name.
    1. If people move to be paid more or pay less tax (and they do in their millions), then you clearly don’t need to waste time and money collecting data that specifically illustrates that people don’t move if they are paid more/taxed less where they already are.
    2. The state ‘taking care’ that tax policies are not taken advantage of by ‘the wrong people’ is the classic mistake the British state always makes and routinely ends up cutting off its nose to spite its face by devising massively over-complex, watered down incentives that achieve nothing, because the 1st principle is not ‘This must work as intended’ but ‘This Must Not Benefit Anyone Not Specifically Intended’.

  8. This sounds like an interesting policy, but would it be particularly impactful? A 25% reduction in income tax for an employee on 30k will increase take home pay by about 875 per year. That’s nice in general, but is that enough to overcome the high paying job opportunities available in larger cities elsewhere in the UK?

  9. DoranTheRhythmStick on

    While I understand the economic idea – lower taxes in areas you want to encourage people to live in – they seem to be coming at this from a preservation of the Welsh language perspective. Wouldn’t this encourage wealthy English, Northern Irish, and especially Scottish people to move to Wales? And those native residents earning poverty wages will still be incentivised to move out to seek better employment.

    I left, initially abroad and then to England, and back then minimum wage earners barely paid taxes anyway. And all the jobs available were minimum wage, and you were lucky if they were full time.

    I’m not saying it’s a *bad* idea to attract wealthy residents to your tax haven, but they seem to want to use it exclusively to incentivise people who are barely tax payers to stay.

Leave A Reply