Le tombe potrebbero essere riutilizzate secondo le proposte per affrontare la mancanza di spazio per i morti

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/oct/03/graves-could-be-reused-under-proposals-to-tackle-lack-of-space-for-the-dead

di boycecodd

39 Comments

  1. DrNuclearSlav on

    I once saw a documentary about graves being re-used for housing. It was called Poltergeist.

  2. Old-Aside1538 on

    Perhaps it is time to admit the country is getting a little crowded.

  3. UnoriginalWebHandle on

    >There would also be safeguards for each individual grave. Where it is currently permitted, graves can only be considered for reuse when the last burial was made at least 75 years ago. The Commission is consulting on whether a new law should use that period, or a different one such as 100 years. If the family of the deceased person objects, no reuse can happen for another 25 years.

    This seems completely reasonable. Your loved ones will have a place to visit, but eventually they’ll die too and you’ll just be a name on a tombstone. The next generations should have the same opportunity to visit their dead.

  4. But there’s still room in hell though right? Don’t want the dead rising.

  5. BigBeanMarketing on

    Just pop me in a bin or throw me in a river please, don’t need any pageantry.

  6. fascinesta on

    Pop me in the oven at 500C for 30-40 minutes and serve me over chips for all I care.

  7. Maybe it’s just because I’m atheist, but I’ve never understood the concept of graves… Or at least since cremation became a thing.

    I can’t imagine why anyone would want to be thrown into a hole in the ground and left to rot.

  8. MrPloppyHead on

    Soylent green is the way forward surely? 🤔 then all the problems go away.

  9. southcoastal on

    Viking burials.

    Or have weekly lorrys collecting corpses and driving them up the tops of mountains so the birds and animals can pick the bones clean.

  10. Emotional-Ebb8321 on

    I’d rather be buried under a tree and help push up daisies that way.

  11. FancyMan_ on

    We should do what Paris did, build a huge catacombs and chuck all the old bodies in there

  12. kahnindustries on

    You could easily fit a 2 bed studio apt in each of those graves. £2850pm

  13. IhateALLmushrooms on

    No space for the living. No space for the dead. No space in prisons.

    Cannot even go to jail to live rent free FML!
    Now cannot even die not to pay someone something.

  14. CaptMelonfish on

    Crypts not a thing anymore?
    If people could figure this out centuries ago why can’t we?

  15. 50YrOldNoviceGymMan on

    So what happens to the body of the previous occupant ?

  16. SuperMegaBeard on

    Hands up all those that don’t want to be ~~crucified~~ buried here.

  17. JoeDaStudd on

    This was extremely common in the past.

    Some old cemetery in cities are higher then surrounding areas despite roads street levels rising and it’s one of the main reasons why catacombs exist.

  18. Mambo_Poa09 on

    I don’t understand why people are still buried instead of cremated, just keep using up more and more space for this forever?

  19. _TLDR_Swinton on

    You should get 100 years in a grave. Then you get exhumed and cremated. 

  20. Slurpielips123 on

    I want to see sky burials on the mountains of Scotland and Wales and the lake district where ospreys and ravens feast on the corpses…….then all the bird shite gets turned into fertiliser afterwards…..

  21. another_online_idiot on

    Just cremate everyone. No need for all these ridiculous expanses of cemeteries all over the place.

  22. Malagate3 on

    Wow, 75 years, or even up to 100 – used to be just 5 years in the hole, then dug up and off to the charnel house or an ossuary. Heck, we only stopped doing it in Britain because it was seen as too catholic.

    Personally I’d opt for fire and be done with it, whether that’s in a crematorium, a pyre, or in a long boat is up to how much I can save up before dying.

  23. TehH4rRy on

    Why don’t be bury them vertically? Gotta be able to cram more biomatter into the ground when they’re all stood up next to one another. An afterlife moshpit.

  24. WittyChipButty on

    Wow… So you die and the burial plot is yours? You don’t buy the plot for x amount of years?
    Scatter funeral plots are also not a thing here? Big plot of grass or unground tomb with just a column full of names.
    When a friend of mine buried her grandma they put the nanny’s ashes onto a pedestrial, played some fancy fountain dancing while the grandma trickeled down to an underground tomb. It looked really pretty.

  25. DigbyGibbers on

    I’ve said in my will I want one of these eco funerals where they just wrap you in a sheet and pop you in a hole in the woods. No chemicals or fancy boxes or bullshit, stick me in the hole and be done with it.

  26. I don’t see the need to have a gravestone, a semi permanent memorial a tree planted on top with your name eventually just on a list of the interned would be fine, but I’d prefer a natural buriel myself.

  27. fourlegsfaster on

    My parents bought a double plot for 50 years, they were given the choice of 25 or 50, years or permanent. They decided on 50 because they were calculating the lifespans of grandchildren and great grandchildren, who could possibly have an interest in visiting their very pretty grave site. The plot they bought was pre-used. [https://www.ford-park-cemetery.org/index.php/cemetery-services/burials](https://www.ford-park-cemetery.org/index.php/cemetery-services/burials)

    There are plenty of green/woodland cemeteries around. [https://www.woodlandburialcompany.com/](https://www.woodlandburialcompany.com/)

  28. Competitive_Mix3627 on

    Are those death tree pod things real? If so that’s a better alternative then graves. Stick a tree down put a plaque on it, job done.

  29. CptnBrokenkey on

    We’re losing allotments and pitch n putt golf courses round here to make more room for cemeteries. I fully support this proposal.

  30. They should go the other way. Make graveyards more permanent. Introduce laws protecting them for 1000+ years. Make tree planting mandatory. Make graveyards dual-use as parks/forest nature reserves. Tax carbon-intensive cremation until cost-parity is acheived. Use graveyards as a way of protecting green space from developers.

  31. SuperpoliticsENTJ on

    Didn’t this happen in the Czech Republic and Guatamala?

  32. Usual-Excitement-970 on

    This housing crisis is really getting out of control.

  33. BroodLord1962 on

    Burials should be stopped altogether, it should be cremations only

  34. Practical-Purchase-9 on

    They’ve always reused graves, or churches would have been filled long ago. They dig them out and inter the remains into an ossuary or they dig the plot deeper and put them back and more in on top.

    I recall reading that in 18th century Paris they were pushing people in ten deep and not bothering digging the plot out first. The walls of the catacombs were bursting sideways into neighboring cellars or some into the river.

  35. This was the historic practice during the medieval and early modern period when graveyards ran out of room. It’s the reason why you see gravestones in old church yards propped up in unusual places.

  36. Thestolenone on

    We’ve been doing this for centuries, go in any parish church graveyard and there are recognisable human bones lying round in the soil. They would either put the larger bones in an ossuary or bury them under the new coffin.

  37. 8Ace8Ace on

    I want my remains scattered at Disneyland.

    Also: I do not wish to be cremated.

  38. Meet-me-behind-bins on

    I’ve been to loads of old graveyards, this is a pretty common thing. They’ve been doing it for centuries. Formerly you rented your space and if your family stopped paying the grave was fair game.

Leave A Reply