Alla giuria è stato detto di esaminare le prove anche se odiano McGregor

https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2024/1119/1481780-conor-mcgregor/

di box_of_carrots

9 Comments

  1. DuckyD2point0 on

    Sure what’s to hate about a serial cheater, woman abuser, druggie, piece of shit scumbag.

  2. dmullaney on

    It is hard to imagine how you get an unbiased decision for such a divisive public figure

  3. Scottish-Fox on

    Every lawyer in the world would say this if they were defending a controversial figure.

  4. dr-ball-legs on

    I won’t comment on my opinion on if he’s guilty or not – we never get the full evidence from news outlets – but it’s shocking that in the closing arguments, McGregor’s lawyer used the fact that she lied to her boyfriend about it when she got home, as evidence that it wasn’t rape. All the while, McGregor has told lies by going out riding all around him with his partner at home minding the kids. Like, if you say someone can’t be trusted on anything because they lied, how ignorant must you be to pretend someone else can be?

  5. How long do you think it would be till they’d have a verdict?

  6. KaleidoscopeLeft5511 on

    considering the physical evidence, that’s not the defence he thinks it is

  7. Twoknightsandarook on

    I hadn’t heard about the jurors reactions to some of McGregors words before. They gasped at “lovely ladies” and had visible reactions to some of his gestures. Seems like they really don’t like him and lawyer is worried.

  8. OfficerPeanut on

    Would this not have been one of the questions asked during jury selection? (Never been called for it myself so unsure of the process)

Leave A Reply