https://www.rtl.lu/news/national/a/2253450.html
Sabato un uomo viene sorpreso a rubare alcolici per diverse centinaia di euro in un negozio.
I negozianti e la polizia si accorgono che aveva già rubato nel negozio il giorno prima.
Da accertamenti in stazione risulta che è noto per furti con scasso plurimi e furti plurimi
Controllano i suoi effetti personali e trovano strumenti per commettere furti con scasso.
L’uomo insulta anche gli agenti e si comporta in modo inaccettabile.
Il Pubblico Ministero decide di lasciarlo libero e non pronuncia l’arresto.
Come possiamo fidarci del sistema giudiziario quando non arresta le persone dopo molteplici furti, furti con scasso e insulti nei confronti degli agenti di polizia…
Non c’è da stupirsi che la microcriminalità e i comportamenti indesiderati siano alle stelle quando il "sistema" tollera questo comportamento…
di wavefan13
2 Comments
>
Translation of the article:
On Saturday morning, a patrol was called to a store on Place Joseph Thorn in the city after a man tried to steal alcohol.
The man was no stranger: he had already stolen from the same store on Friday, but was able to escape.
At the police station, officers discovered that the man had already been arrested several times for burglary and theft. During the body search, tools for breaking in were found.
Since the man was also behaving inappropriately at the police station and did not calm down, he was also booked for insulting an official in addition to the theft.
Edit:
>The Public Prosecutor decides to let him walk free and doesn’t pronounce an arrest
Where do you take that from?
Tools to break in are not proof of break-ins, alas. So there’s only _one_ case documenting two incidents that happened in a short period of time. Not much to go on:
You put people in jail pre-trial when a) there’s a flight risk (address unknown, foreign citizen), b) there’s a serious offense (100€ stolen ain’t it), c) there’s a serious risk of the serious offense being reiterated or a risk of pressuring witnesses.
Since those conditions aren’t met, what would be nice, is go be able to judge the person within weeks after they got arrested. Only quick and systematic punitive justice (pre-trial jail is _not_ a punishment) is an efficient deterrent.
Ergo, we’d need three times more judges sitting in criminal chambers, and a proportionately beefed up judicial support staff (clerks, registrars, legal assistants).