Yep. This is what all countries are going to learn from this. No nukes and your borders aren’t guaranteed. I bet we see an explosion of countries starting nuke programs.
PineBNorth85 on
And which would they prefer? If they get nukes – i dont see why they wouldnt be afraid to use them because they are in an existential war.
CannonFodder58 on
Why not both?
OnionTruck on
We literally swore to protect them when they gave up their nukes back in the day.
SomeoneRandom007 on
Ukraine already has a lot of the knowledge to make nukes. They may have kept the physics data, maybe even bomb designs. What they won’t have is nuclear material. The easier bomb to make is Uranium, the best bomb to make is Plutonium… but Ukraine don’t have any plutonium. Or at least… probably don’t have any plutonium…
IndistinctChatters on
Porque no los dos?
Codeworks on
Helping Ukraine win is the only way non proliferation has the slightest chance of remaining.
Polysticks on
If I were Zelensky I’d be digging some very deep tunnels in West Ukraine to house potential Nuke development.
PoliticalCanvas on
100% right.
Until 2023 year there were hopes that West at lest somehow restore functionality of International Law, but Ukrainian war shown that West completely agree with Russian “WMD-Might make Right/True” logic.
PoliticalCanvas on
Ukraine doesn’t need nukes. Ukraine need WMD MAD.
Any form of WMD MAD.
For example, if most Ukrainians will start study all publicly available information about WMD-creation, even this will be basic form of MAD. Because of unprecedented possibilities of civil tech and enormous numbers of Ukraine expats.
Even basic redistribution of Ukrainian nuclear waste and drones over territory of Ukraine will be very effective MAD against Russia, that essentially is just Moscow city-state and its colonies.
etzel1200 on
Why not both?
Affectionate_News796 on
It’s not impossible that Ukraine already has nukes. Their ultimate Joker.
16 Comments
This is the way
Yep. This is what all countries are going to learn from this. No nukes and your borders aren’t guaranteed. I bet we see an explosion of countries starting nuke programs.
And which would they prefer? If they get nukes – i dont see why they wouldnt be afraid to use them because they are in an existential war.
Why not both?
We literally swore to protect them when they gave up their nukes back in the day.
Ukraine already has a lot of the knowledge to make nukes. They may have kept the physics data, maybe even bomb designs. What they won’t have is nuclear material. The easier bomb to make is Uranium, the best bomb to make is Plutonium… but Ukraine don’t have any plutonium. Or at least… probably don’t have any plutonium…
Porque no los dos?
Helping Ukraine win is the only way non proliferation has the slightest chance of remaining.
If I were Zelensky I’d be digging some very deep tunnels in West Ukraine to house potential Nuke development.
100% right.
Until 2023 year there were hopes that West at lest somehow restore functionality of International Law, but Ukrainian war shown that West completely agree with Russian “WMD-Might make Right/True” logic.
Ukraine doesn’t need nukes. Ukraine need WMD MAD.
Any form of WMD MAD.
For example, if most Ukrainians will start study all publicly available information about WMD-creation, even this will be basic form of MAD. Because of unprecedented possibilities of civil tech and enormous numbers of Ukraine expats.
Even basic redistribution of Ukrainian nuclear waste and drones over territory of Ukraine will be very effective MAD against Russia, that essentially is just Moscow city-state and its colonies.
Why not both?
It’s not impossible that Ukraine already has nukes. Their ultimate Joker.
Why not both? Booom booom *smiling flork*
Yay he’s finally mentioning it
NUKE-on-a-drone has entered the chat