Biden consente all’Ucraina di colpire la Russia con missili statunitensi a lungo raggio

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/biden-ukraine-russia-atacms-missiles.html

di 66348923675346899756

6 Comments

  1. 66348923675346899756 on

    🦀 Cela Evropa jim je to dopovedovala že mesece, današnji raketni napad na elektrarne in prenosno omrežje (preko 120 raket in skoraj sto dronov, en večjih) pa je očitno prevesil tehtnico. Po Trumpovi izvolitvi so se sicer raketni in dron napadi Rusije močno okrepili, prav tako pa so sprožili nove ofenzive

    Zgembo in ostali rusofili na aparatih. Lahko že napovem, da bodo tu strašili z jedrskim orožjem in ne vem kaj še (tako kot ob vsaki pomoči žrtvi do zdaj)

  2. To je bil torej namen PR kampanje s SK vojaki. Da vidimo sedaj, koliko časa bo trajal hype z ATACMS wunderwaffe.

    Bi si skoraj upal napovedati, da bo že čez en mesec to v pozabi, enako kot se je zgodilo z Javelini, Himarsi, Abramsi, Leopardi, F-16 in ostalimi “gamechangerji”. Ukrajini pa se bo medtem fronta še naprej sesuvala.

    Sicer se je pa v NYT končno pojavil en malo bolj realističen članek.

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/opinion/trump-ukraine-russia-war.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/opinion/trump-ukraine-russia-war.html)

    *Dozens of people, and often hundreds, are dying every day in this grinding war. Mr. Trump should seize the chance to save lives. Nobody is coming to save Ukraine. A settlement will eventually be needed.*

    *Of course the United States is leery of Ukraine joining NATO: If we were willing to go to war with Russia to save Ukraine, we’d be doing so right now. If the United States truly wanted Ukraine to win at all costs, it would send troops and lift the restrictions on the weapons. But nobody sensible — this writer included — wants to risk igniting a direct war between the nuclear-armed nemeses Russia and the United States.*

    ***I believe it’s right to call Ukraine a proxy war, because I think it’s reasonable to conclude that the Biden administration has supported the war not only in deference to righteous Ukrainian determination to fight off Russia but also because the war was a chance to*** [debilitate our enemy](https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/the-west-reaps-multiple-benefits-from-backing-ukraine-against-russia/) ***without directly engaging it.***

    *It is this uneasy dynamic — a Ukraine close to the West, striving for inclusion in the West, but not truly part of it — that has defined the U.S. management of this disastrous war. We want Ukraine to function as a protectorate, but ultimately, we are unwilling to protect it. A sensible, ugly strategy — tactically defensible but morally reprehensible.*

    *America is not going to save Ukraine. Maybe we need Mr. Trump — brazen and unscrupulous — to finally say so out loud and act accordingly.*

Leave A Reply