Labour delivering everything the conservatives couldn’t, no flashy gimmicks, just proper hardworking brits at every level.
For the many, not the few.
DrNuclearSlav on
Down from eleven billion a week to only ten billion a week.
We did it Patrick!
Outside-Ad4532 on
Damn how will the economy cope 1mill a year is still to low mabey return to a 17th century immigration policy to get those numbers up.
ginge159 on
These figures are until June and therefore do not reflect anything Labour has or has not done.
sink-the-rafts on
Thanks God. Now let’s aim for net zero immigration.
trmetroidmaniac on
Net migration is a pretty rough guide, and only a good metric if people are essentially fungible i.e. the person leaving is equivalent to the person entering.
If this figure has fallen, I want to know the breakdown of how. Are fewer people coming in, or are more people leaving?
GodwynsBalls on
“Because the figures are until June, they are a reflection of policies under the previous Conservative government.” Do people just not read articles anymore?
KasamUK on
And all it cost was financial crippling our universities
zeros3ss on
Brilliant. I guess I get a pay rise now that there are less people ‘depressing wages ‘ in the country, right? RIGHT?
CountryUnusual7099 on
They’re measured until June, but the Starmer fanboys are already crediting Starmer even though he wasn’t PM in June
amarrly on
People don’t even question what the ‘cost of living’ means anymore. We use to have reasons, like a blocked canal, oil price rises ect
JustLetItAllBurn on
>Shadow home secretary Chris Philp says a figure of 350,000 would still be “significantly” too high.
It’s hilarious that the Tories were directly responsible for such high migration levels, then as soon as they’re out they’re all “Oh no, migration levels are too high!”
12 Comments
Labour delivering everything the conservatives couldn’t, no flashy gimmicks, just proper hardworking brits at every level.
For the many, not the few.
Down from eleven billion a week to only ten billion a week.
We did it Patrick!
Damn how will the economy cope 1mill a year is still to low mabey return to a 17th century immigration policy to get those numbers up.
These figures are until June and therefore do not reflect anything Labour has or has not done.
Thanks God. Now let’s aim for net zero immigration.
Net migration is a pretty rough guide, and only a good metric if people are essentially fungible i.e. the person leaving is equivalent to the person entering.
If this figure has fallen, I want to know the breakdown of how. Are fewer people coming in, or are more people leaving?
“Because the figures are until June, they are a reflection of policies under the previous Conservative government.” Do people just not read articles anymore?
And all it cost was financial crippling our universities
Brilliant. I guess I get a pay rise now that there are less people ‘depressing wages ‘ in the country, right? RIGHT?
They’re measured until June, but the Starmer fanboys are already crediting Starmer even though he wasn’t PM in June
People don’t even question what the ‘cost of living’ means anymore. We use to have reasons, like a blocked canal, oil price rises ect
>Shadow home secretary Chris Philp says a figure of 350,000 would still be “significantly” too high.
It’s hilarious that the Tories were directly responsible for such high migration levels, then as soon as they’re out they’re all “Oh no, migration levels are too high!”